4

There are several schematics that show, for example, a MIC signal line in a 6- or 8-conductor ribbon cable for crimped RJ45 connectors that is marked as shielded. The shield is shown as the adjacent wire in the cable (MICE, microphone earth in this example).

I know that there is STP, Ethernet cables with pairwise shielded conductors, even crimpable cables with shielded individual conductors for serious medical instruments, but in practice I see only plain unshielded cables and plastic RJ45 plugs used for microphones, adapters, etc. even from quality producers in pictures and YouTube videos, and nothing else.

As this situation is in complete contradiction with the need for shielding for low level audio signals especially in a ham environment, I am at a complete loss. Can someone help me where to look further? I'd like to make and adapter, and I could hack together some solution cutting an RJ45 Cat cable short and solder to normal shielded audio cables, but at this point I'd like to know the truth about the topic. :-)

(Since I did not have enough reputation points, I could not add more descriptive tags.)

ha3flt
  • 173
  • 9

4 Answers4

3

Shielded cables have long been used in radio communications to prevent RF interference and external noise pickup in microphone lines. However, shielding alone is often not enough, and proper RF interference protection requires a system-wide approach. This post explores the role of shielding, how microphone circuits have evolved over time, and why unshielded RJ45-based microphone connections are still widely used despite their apparent limitations.


Why Shielded Cables Are Used in Microphone Lines

Shielding is traditionally used to:

  • Prevent RF pickup from strong transmitters
  • Reduce induced noise from power lines, digital circuits, and other sources
  • Minimize RF feedback loops, which can cause distortion and oscillations in transmitted audio

In classic radio setups, dynamic microphones were commonly used. These microphones contain no active electronics, meaning they were relatively immune to RF rectification effects, where strong RF signals induce unwanted currents in circuits. Shielding the microphone line was often sufficient to prevent interference.

However, as technology advanced, electret condenser microphones became more common due to their small size and low cost. These microphones include a small FET amplifier inside the capsule to convert the condenser element’s high impedance into a lower, more usable impedance. This change introduced a new problem:

The FET in the microphone can pick up RF signals, rectify them, and feed interference back into the microphone line.

This makes the entire microphone system more susceptible to RF pickup, requiring additional filtering and shielding strategies.

Incidentally, bipolar transistor amplifiers are much more susceptible to this effect of rectifying (detecting) the RF picked up by the signal line. Some circuit designers use the J-FET input stage in the microphone amplifier, even if the impedance is very low, for that reason. (The difference is that the J-FET gate pn junction is non-conducting, while the BJT base is always forward-biased in amplifiers, making the latter an effective half-wave rectifier.)


RF Protection: More Than Just Shielding

To properly protect microphone circuits from RF interference, manufacturers and radio operators employ several key techniques:

  1. Shielding the cable using braided shielding, foil, or shielded twisted pair
  2. Using ferrite chokes on microphone cables to suppress common-mode RF
  3. Adding shunt capacitors and series inductors to block high-frequency RF from entering the audio path
  4. Ensuring proper grounding at both the transceiver and microphone ends

Modern amateur radio transceivers incorporate these RF protection techniques on both the microphone and transceiver sides, but not all designs are equally effective.


Why RJ45-Based Microphone Connections Use Unshielded Cables

Many modern transceivers use RJ45 connectors for microphone inputs, and surprisingly, many commercial microphones and adapters still use unshielded cables. (Note: shielded cables are commonly available for high-speed Ethernet and other applications. They aim to reduce noise interference as well as cross-talk across pairs.) This seems counterintuitive given the importance of shielding for low-level audio signals, especially in RF-heavy ham environments.

A few reasons why unshielded cables might still be used:

  • Cost and manufacturing simplicity – Unshielded cables are cheaper and easier to work with.
  • Microphone circuit design compensates for interference – Some radios have built-in RF suppression, making external shielding less critical.
  • Alternative shielding techniques – In flat ribbon cables, microphone lines may be positioned between ground, +V and control lines (all RF bypassed), providing partial shielding.

For strong RF environments, however, unshielded cables can be a weak point. Upgrading to shielded twisted pair (STP) cables or modifying the setup with RF chokes and additional filtering can help mitigate interference.

Keep in mind that radio communication systems typically do not require the S/N ratio level required by hi-fi audio equipment.


How RF feedback into AF happens

Because of the reasonably low signal impedance, short cable length, and modest S/N ratio required for radio communication, picking up AC hum or noise from nearby devices is rather easily mitigated. However, RF feedback is a bigger challenge, especially for AM and SSB transmitters. It is less problematic with FM due to the constant envelope. It can be problematic in CW mode due to a keying malfunction.

How RF feedback happens

As you see in the diagram above, the common mode current in the entire station (big loop) is the major source of the RF current. [Note] Then, sharing the microphone signal ground with the shield (chassis ground) makes a fraction of the RF current divert into the mic amp circuit. No amount of shunt capacitors will fix this problem because it is a ground loop problem.

[Note] If the antenna is near the operating position, reactive near-field interaction is also a good possibility, in which case the antenna couples with the microphone cable through E and H fields directly. However, the rest of the mechanism and how to interrupt the feedback are analogous.

The ineffective use of shields fails to block RF feedback.

How to avoid the RF feedback

Separate the microphone signal ground from the shield (chassis ground), even if not a complete shield, is a good first step. By not using the shield as a signal path, the stray RF current goes straight to the chassis ground, not the mic amp. This may only be a modest reduction if the shield is only partial (like flat ribbon cables). Additionally, RF chokes at the mic amp input stage (on the circuit board) effectively interrupt the small (transmitter's internal ground) loop. However, RF chokes on the microphone cable outside the transmitter may be ineffective because environmental coupling can partially bypass that choke.

How to avoid the RF feedback

Using a shield as just a shield and not as the signal ground line is the correct way to use the shield. Once you pass signal current on the shield (i.e., use both ends of the shield), the potential at various places on the shield is not the same, and it loses the Faraday cage effect. In other words, picks up the noise and RFI more easily than carrying the return current / ref potential on a different line, depending on how you do it, of course. Shielded twisted pair is one of the best approaches, even if the signal is unbalanced.

For my stations, I use shielded twisted pair cables whenever possible for my radio setup, even down to the straight keys. The shield is connected only to the transceiver side, reducing the risk of RF entering the transceiver.

Also, using a very effective common mode choke on the feedline removes the source of the stray RF current and sends the transmitted power just to the antenna system. In order for this to be effective, the choke must be high impedance, not just the reactive part but also the resistive part. This "high impedance" is in relation to the impedance of the common mode loop circuit, not to the 50 ohms, so it is best to have north of 1000 ohm, or better yet, 2000+ ohm.

Ryuji AB1WX
  • 2,962
  • 1
  • 1
  • 26
3

Is there really a shielding of low-level audio frequency signals (e.g. for microphones) in the factory-made cables with (plastic) RJ45 connectors?

Some factory-made cables do indeed appear to have custom shielding. Here is a picture of the plug from the microphone extension cable of a Kenwood TM-D710GA:

Plug

Pin 6 is connected to, not an insulated wire, but what appears to be a foil shield. That said, strangely, documentation of the pinout claims that pin 6 is the microphone signal wire and pin 5 is ground. I have no explanation for this. Still, I think this photo demonstrates that there is something custom going on with this cable.

Kevin Reid AG6YO
  • 25,080
  • 7
  • 55
  • 106
  • 1
    Using a shield as just a shield and not as the ground wire is the correct way to use the shield. Once you pass signal current on the shield (i.e., use both ends of the shield), the potential at various places on the shield is not the same, and it loses the Faraday cage effect. In other words, picks up the noise and RFI more easily than carrying the return current / ref potential on a different line, depending on how you do it, of course. Shielded twisted pair is one of the best approaches, even if the signal is unbalanced. – Ryuji AB1WX Feb 25 '25 at 17:18
  • 1
    That's pin 3 which is assigned to ground in the manual (page 15) – user71659 Feb 25 '25 at 22:20
  • 2
    More details on the shield in the Kenwood cable can be found at https://ham.stackexchange.com/questions/14458/how-do-i-put-an-rj-45-connector-on-to-repair-a-kenwood-mc-59-microphone-cable – user3486184 Feb 26 '25 at 02:07
  • Kevin, thank you for this example, I've never seen such a thing. If someone wound that foil tightly, it might be solid enough to hold against the harshness of daily use... So bizarre, so bizarre. :-) – ha3flt Feb 26 '25 at 10:47
2

Good question. But are you sure the Mic cable isn't shielded? It should be, on an OEM cable, if the diagram says so.

The microphone cables I've repaired/replaced (Yaesu mobiles) are not Ribbon, STP or UTP, they're a small bundle of 4 or 5 wires, twisted together, with one of the cables carefully wrapped with a ground. The ground is not a braid, it's many loose strands, nicely covering the microphone cable. There's also a separate uninsulated "signal ground" for the other functions.

Here is my cable, 25 years old and falling apart so you can see the insides - on the left:

two cables

The cheap replacement microphone cable on the right has no shielding visible, so it's likely just a 6 core pin to pin cable, nominally compatible with the original but with more buzz.

original RJ11

Inside the original RJ11 I can see the ground wire, while the clone just has straight insulated wires.


The choice of an unshielded RJ45 (RJ11 in my case) is for cost and mechanical convenience, it's separate to the cable shielding design. The short section of badly-shielded cable through the connector won't matter much at these frequencies (60 Hz and up to 440 MHz). There are shielded RJ45 plugs and jacks, of course, for Cat6A and up, but this is to reduce leakage and cross-talk at much higher frequencies.

tomnexus
  • 12,365
  • 17
  • 36
2

Ethernet cables have the wires arranged in twisted pairs, the signal and ground wires are twisted together. This is a form of shielding, a twisted pair has some similar properties to a coaxial cable but is much cheaper to produce. If the "mic earth" pin is also labeled as the shield that is likely what they mean.

Ethernet cables can also come with additional layers of shielding, with one shield around the outside of the cable, or a shield wrapped around each twisted pair (or both, I believe CAT8 cables have both). These are typically grounded through an electrode around the outside of the RJ45 connector.

If you're seeing that most commercial audio gear using Ethernet cables doesn't use that additional shielding, it's probably because the additional shielding would be overkill. Even for Ethernet the additional shielding is only needed when pushing the signals to much higher frequencies/bandwidth or over very long cable runs (relative to the wavelength of the signal). At 20 kHz the electromagnetic wavelength is 15 kilometers, so the length of the cables and tightness of the winding are extremely small relative to the wavelength. Unless you actually have noise getting in over a cable I probably wouldn't worry about it.

Side note: I'm not sure what you mean about ribbon cables. Ribbon cables are wide and flat (like a ribbon) with all the wires running parallel, and the connector for a ribbon cable is also a wide rectangle that is only about one wire width tall. It's a completely different shape to an Ethernet cable with an RJ45 connector.