I define an inline function object in a header file, like this:
// fmap.hpp
namespace util {
inline auto constexpr fmap = boost::hana::curry<2>(boost::hana::flip(boost::hana::transform));
}
Client code can simply #include "fmap.hpp" and start using util::fmap as they like.
So far so good.
But sometimes the definition of such objects can be cumbersome to read, if they are so full of qui::quo::qua::lify.
How can I alleviate this?
Ideally, I'd like the definition of fmap to look like this:
namespace util {
inline auto constexpr fmap = curry<2>(flip(transform));
}
but at the same time I don't want to put a using namespace boost::hana; at top level, as client code's namespace would be cluttered with boost::hana (or from other namespaces) names, not to mention that some compilers have hard time with using namespace directives in generic lambdas.
Is there some C++ guideline or best practice that comes handy in this situation?