How do I tell group_by to group the data by all columns except a given one?
With aggregate, it would be aggregate(x ~ ., ...).
I tried group_by(data, -x), but that groups by the negative-of-x (i.e. the same as grouping by x).
How do I tell group_by to group the data by all columns except a given one?
With aggregate, it would be aggregate(x ~ ., ...).
I tried group_by(data, -x), but that groups by the negative-of-x (i.e. the same as grouping by x).
In dplyr 1.0.0 coming up, the _at functions are falling into the superseded lifecycle (i.e. while they remain in dplyr for the foreseeable future, there are now better alternatives that are more actively developed). The new way to accomplish this is via the across function:
df %>%
group_by(across(c(-hp)))
A small update on this question because I stumbled across this myself and found an elegant solution with current version of dplyr (0.7.4):
Inside group_by_at(), you can supply the names of columns the same way as in the select() function using vars(). This enables us to group by everything but one column (hp in this example) by writing:
library(dplyr)
df <- as_tibble(mtcars, rownames = "car")
df %>% group_by_at(vars(-hp))
Building on the @eipi10's dplyr 0.7.0 edit, group_by_at appears to be the right function for this job. However, if you are simply looking to omit column "x", then you can use:
new2.0 <- dat %>%
group_by_at(vars(-x)) %>%
summarize(mean_value = mean(value))
Using @eipi10's example data:
# Fake data
set.seed(492)
dat <- data.frame(value = rnorm(1000),
g1 = sample(LETTERS, 1000, replace = TRUE),
g2 = sample(letters, 1000, replace = TRUE),
g3 = sample(1:10, replace = TRUE),
other = sample(c("red", "green", "black"), 1000, replace = TRUE))
new <- dat %>%
group_by_at(names(dat)[-grep("value", names(dat))]) %>%
summarise(meanValue = mean(value))
new2.0 <- dat %>%
group_by_at(vars(-value)) %>%
summarize(meanValue = mean(value))
identical(new, new2.0)
# [1] TRUE
You can do this using standard evaluation (group_by_ instead of group_by):
# Fake data
set.seed(492)
dat = data.frame(value=rnorm(1000), g1=sample(LETTERS,1000,replace=TRUE),
g2=sample(letters,1000,replace=TRUE), g3=sample(1:10, replace=TRUE),
other=sample(c("red","green","black"),1000,replace=TRUE))
dat %>% group_by_(.dots=names(dat)[-grep("value", names(dat))]) %>%
summarise(meanValue=mean(value))
g1 g2 g3 other meanValue <fctr> <fctr> <int> <fctr> <dbl> 1 A a 2 green 0.89281475 2 A b 2 red -0.03558775 3 A b 5 black -1.79184218 4 A c 10 black 0.17518610 5 A e 5 black 0.25830392 ...
See this vignette for more on standard vs. non-standard evaluation in dplyr.
dplyr 0.7.0To address @ÖmerAn's comment: It looks like group_by_at is the way to go in dplyr 0.7.0 (someone please correct me if I'm wrong about this). For example:
dat %>%
group_by_at(setdiff(names(dat), "value")) %>%
summarise(meanValue=mean(value))
# Groups: g1, g2, g3 [?] g1 g2 g3 other meanValue <fctr> <fctr> <int> <fctr> <dbl> 1 A a 2 green 0.89281475 2 A b 2 red -0.03558775 3 A b 5 black -1.79184218 4 A c 10 black 0.17518610 5 A e 5 black 0.25830392 6 A e 5 red -0.81879788 7 A e 7 green 0.30836054 8 A f 2 green 0.05537047 9 A g 1 black 1.00156405 10 A g 10 black 1.26884303 # ... with 949 more rows
Let's confirm both methods give the same output (in dplyr 0.7.0):
new = dat %>%
group_by_at(setdiff(names(dat), "value")) %>%
summarise(meanValue=mean(value))
old = dat %>%
group_by_(.dots=names(dat)[-grep("value", names(dat))]) %>%
summarise(meanValue=mean(value))
identical(old, new)
# [1] TRUE