Why does Resharper 9 suggest to use string instead of String, when referring to a class, like String.IsNullOrEmpty() or String.Format(), while Resharper 8 didn't ?
Based on a SO post, it should not. https://stackoverflow.com/a/7077/3410616
Asked
Active
Viewed 617 times
1
-
4If Jon Skeet mentions `Personally I tend to use string everywhere... – Jon Skeet Feb 12 '12 at 16:34`, then the universe bends to match this. Resharper is no exception. – MX D Oct 21 '15 at 09:52
-
Because that's a new diagnostic they introduced in that version. You can reconfigure that if it bothers you. – Lucas Trzesniewski Nov 08 '15 at 17:20
-
@LucasTrzesniewski Can you source it ? – Stralos Nov 08 '15 at 19:07
-
1@Stralos nope, I just noticed it at some point too. JetBrains don't give such a detailed changelog AFAIK - they only list major changes between versions, and this one is a minor one. – Lucas Trzesniewski Nov 08 '15 at 19:10
-
Not sure it is related to resharper. I do not have resharper and it suggest the same for me. I am using VS2015 Pro. – ehh Jan 03 '16 at 14:26
-
@JimG. Your edit looks like an overall improvement, but removing the [resharper] tag while leaving in [resharper-9.0] is not appropriate. If it's not related to Resharper, then both tags should go. If it is related to Resharper, then [resharper] should stay. Optionally, [resharper-9.0] can go, but that's iffy. Discussion on that last part [here](http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/85358/what-are-the-guidelines-for-using-version-specific-tags) and [here](http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/258713/what-to-do-about-teamcity-and-resharper). – Jan 03 '16 at 14:28
-
This seems to show up in corefx guidelines https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/blob/master/Documentation/coding-guidelines/coding-style.md – Jeff Jan 03 '16 at 14:28
1 Answers
2
Seems to be the latest trend and also suggested under Roslyn:
https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/blob/master/Documentation/coding-guidelines/coding-style.md
Jeff
- 2,701
- 2
- 22
- 35