Difference between spring @Controller and @RestController annotation

Question

Difference between spring @Controller and @RestController annotation.

Can @Controller annotation be used for both Web MVC and REST applications?
If yes, how can we differentiate if it is Web MVC or REST application.

Answer 1

• @Controller is used to mark classes as Spring MVC Controller.
• @RestController is a convenience annotation that does nothing more than adding the @Controller and @ResponseBody annotations (see: Javadoc)

So the following two controller definitions should do the same

@Controller
@ResponseBody
public class MyController { }

@RestController
public class MyRestController { }

Answer 2

In the code below I'll show you the difference between @controller

@Controller
public class RestClassName{

  @RequestMapping(value={"/uri"})
  @ResponseBody
  public ObjectResponse functionRestName(){
      //...
      return instance;
   }
}

and @RestController

@RestController
public class RestClassName{

  @RequestMapping(value={"/uri"})
  public ObjectResponse functionRestName(){
      //...
      return instance;
   }
}

the @ResponseBody is activated by default. You don't need to add it above the function signature.

Answer 3

@RestController is the combination of @Controller and @ResponseBody.

Flow of request in a @Controller class without using a @ResponseBody annotation:

@RestController returns an object as response instead of view.

Answer 4

If you use @RestController you cannot return a view (By using Viewresolver in Spring/springboot) and yes @ResponseBody is not needed in this case.

If you use @Controller you can return a view in Spring web MVC.

Answer 5

@RestController annotated classes are the same as @Controller but the @ResponseBody on the handler methods are implied.

Answer 6

Actually, be careful - they are not exactly the same.

If you define any interceptors within your application, they will not apply to Controllers annotated as @RestController, however they do work with @Controller annotated controllers.

ie. configuration for the interceptor:

@Configuration
public class WebMvcConfiguration extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {


    @Override
    public void addInterceptors(InterceptorRegistry registry) {
        registry.addInterceptor(new TemplateMappingInterceptor()).addPathPatterns("/**", "/admin-functions**").excludePathPatterns("/login**");
    }

}

and in the declaration of a Spring controller:

@Controller
public class AdminServiceController {...

Will work, however

@RestController
public class AdminServiceController {...

does not end up having the interceptor being associated with it.

Answer 7

As you can see in Spring documentation (Spring RestController Documentation) Rest Controller annotation is the same as Controller annotation, but assuming that @ResponseBody is active by default, so all the Java objects are serialized to JSON representation in the response body.

Answer 8

@Controller returns View. @RestController returns ResponseBody.

Answer 9

THE new @RestController annotation in Spring4+, which marks the class as a controller where every method returns a domain object instead of a view. It’s shorthand for @Controller and @ResponseBody rolled together.

Answer 10

@RestController was provided since Spring 4.0.1. These controllers indicate that here @RequestMapping methods assume @ResponseBody semantics by default.

In earlier versions the similar functionality could be achieved by using below:

1. @RequestMapping coupled with @ResponseBody like @RequestMapping(value = "/abc", method = RequestMethod.GET, produces ="application/xml") public @ResponseBody MyBean fetch(){ return new MyBean("hi") }

2. <mvc:annotation-driven/> may be used as one of the ways for using JSON with Jackson or xml.

3. MyBean can be defined like

@XmlRootElement(name = "MyBean") @XmlType(propOrder = {"field2", "field1"}) public class MyBean{ field1 field2 .. //getter, setter }

4. @ResponseBody is treated as the view here among MVC and it is dispatched directly instead being dispatched from Dispatcher Servlet and the respective converters convert the response in the related format like text/html, application/xml, application/json .

However, the Restcontroller is already coupled with ResponseBody and the respective converters. Secondly, here, since instead of converting the responsebody, it is automatically converted to http response.

Answer 11

@Controller is used in legacy systems which use JSPs. it can return views. @RestController is to mark the controller is providing REST services with JSON response type. so it wraps @Controller and @ResponseBody annotations together.

Answer 12

• @Controller: This annotation is just a specialized version of @Component and it allows the controller classes to be auto-detected based on classpath scanning.
• @RestController: This annotation is a specialized version of @Controller which adds @Controller and @ResponseBody annotation automatically so we do not have to add @ResponseBody to our mapping methods.

Answer 13

The @Controller annotation indicates that the class is a "Controller" like a web controller while @RestController annotation indicates that the class is a controller where @RequestMapping methods assume @ResponseBody semantics by default i.e. servicing REST API

Answer 14

@RestController is composition of @Controller and @ResponseBody, if we are not using the @ResponseBody in Method signature then we need to use the @Restcontroller.

Answer 15

Instead of using @Controller and @ResponseBody, @RestController let's you expose Rest APIs in Spring 4.0 and above.